# llama.cpp vs worklenz

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | worklenz |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 ✓ | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 ✓ | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 63/100 for worklenz, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for worklenz.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [worklenz](https://selfhost.directory/project/worklenz) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/worklenz.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-worklenz