# llama.cpp vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 132 663 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 306 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1458 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | b11969 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1458 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 306 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-woodpecker-ci