# llama.cpp vs WireGuard Easy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | WireGuard Easy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #7 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 132 674 ✓ | 27 320 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 317 ✓ | +332 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1461 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v15.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 73/100 for WireGuard Easy, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for WireGuard Easy.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 317 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [WireGuard Easy](https://selfhost.directory/project/wireguard-easy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wireguard-easy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-wireguard-easy