# llama.cpp vs WeTTY

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | WeTTY |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #7 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 ✓ | 5 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 ✓ | +29 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1464 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.2.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 68/100 for WeTTY, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for WeTTY.

If you want the quickest setup, WeTTY is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [WeTTY](https://selfhost.directory/project/wetty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wetty.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-wetty