llama.cppvsvito
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | vito | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #4 of 27 in Server Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 | 3 259 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1465 | 9 |
| Latest release | b11979 · 29 Oct 2026 | 4.2.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 64/100 for vito, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1465 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for vito.
If you want the quickest setup, vito is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →vito details →