# llama.cpp vs Vigil365

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Vigil365 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 132 714 ✓ | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 259 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Vigil365 needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 259 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Vigil365](https://selfhost.directory/project/vigil365) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vigil365.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-vigil365