llama.cppvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 132 646 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 289 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1457 | 9 |
| Latest release | b11968 · 28 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | C++ | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1457 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 289 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →UUSEC WAF details →