# llama.cpp vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 132 646 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 289 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1457 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | b11968 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1457 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-url-to-png