# llama.cpp vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 ✓ | 11 046 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 ✓ | +47 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1464 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for unopim.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-unopim