# llama.cpp vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 132 607 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 250 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1451 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | b11954 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1451 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for uMap.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 250 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-umap