# llama.cpp vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 132 621 ✓ | 16 641 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 264 ✓ | +254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1454 ✓ | 49 |
| Latest release | b11962 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1454 stable releases in the past year, against 49 for trigger.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 264 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-trigger