# llama.cpp vs Trenova

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Trenova |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 669 ✓ | 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 312 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1461 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Trenova.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Trenova needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 312 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Trenova](https://selfhost.directory/project/trenova) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trenova.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-trenova