# llama.cpp vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 132 628 ✓ | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 271 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1455 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | b11963 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1455 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 271 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-transfersh