# llama.cpp vs tiledesk

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | tiledesk |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #46 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 132 728 ✓ | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 273 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1468 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | b11982 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.2.1 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Mustache |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 51/100 for tiledesk, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1468 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tiledesk.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; tiledesk needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [tiledesk](https://selfhost.directory/project/tiledesk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tiledesk.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-tiledesk