# llama.cpp vs Tigase XMPP Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Tigase XMPP Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #30 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 ✓ | 358 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1463 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | b11977 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | tigase-server-dist-8.4.3 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 56/100 for Tigase XMPP Server, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1463 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Tigase XMPP Server.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Tigase XMPP Server needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Tigase XMPP Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/tigase-xmpp-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tigase-xmpp-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-tigase-xmpp-server