# llama.cpp vs Teleport

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Teleport |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 132 628 ✓ | 21 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 271 ✓ | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1457 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | b11968 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 76/100 for Teleport, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1457 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 271 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Teleport](https://selfhost.directory/project/teleport) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/teleport.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-teleport