llama.cppvssysmon
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | sysmon | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #85 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 | 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1463 | 0 |
| Latest release | b11977 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | CSS |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 41/100 for sysmon, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1463 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sysmon.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →sysmon details →