llama.cppvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 132 663 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 306 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1458 | 39 |
| Latest release | b11969 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Go |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1458 stable releases in the past year, against 39 for storj.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 306 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →storj details →