# llama.cpp vs Standard Notes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Standard Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 ✓ | 6 686 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 ✓ | +53 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1464 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Standard Notes](https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-standard-notes