# llama.cpp vs speedtest-rust

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | speedtest-rust |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 ✓ | 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1463 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | b11977 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 45/100 for speedtest-rust, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1463 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for speedtest-rust.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [speedtest-rust](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-rust) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-rust.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-speedtest-rust