# llama.cpp vs Snort

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Snort |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #53 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 132 728 ✓ | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 273 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1468 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | b11982 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.3 · 8 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 47/100 for Snort, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1468 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Snort.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Snort](https://selfhost.directory/project/snort) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/snort.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-snort