# llama.cpp vs Silo

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Silo |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #35 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 132 669 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 312 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1461 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.8.17 · 19 Jan 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 48/100 for Silo, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Silo.

If you want the quickest setup, Silo is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 312 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Silo](https://selfhost.directory/project/silo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/silo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-silo