# llama.cpp vs series-troxide

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | series-troxide |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #85 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 757 ✓ | 283 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 302 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1468 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | b11982 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 47/100 for series-troxide, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1468 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for series-troxide.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [series-troxide](https://selfhost.directory/project/series-troxide) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/series-troxide.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-series-troxide