# llama.cpp vs Serendipity

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Serendipity |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #7 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 132 757 ✓ | 229 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 302 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1469 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | b11985 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.6.1 · 22 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | C++ | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 53/100 for Serendipity, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1469 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Serendipity.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Serendipity](https://selfhost.directory/project/serendipity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/serendipity.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-serendipity