# llama.cpp vs sentora-core

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | sentora-core |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #8 of 10 in Control Panel |
| GitHub stars | 132 728 ✓ | 676 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 273 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1468 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | b11982 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 49/100 for sentora-core, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1468 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sentora-core.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [sentora-core](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentora-core) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentora-core.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-sentora-core