# llama.cpp vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 132 646 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 289 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1458 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | b11969 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1458 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-scada-lts