# llama.cpp vs SandBase Harness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | SandBase Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #169 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 ✓ | 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1464 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for SandBase Harness.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [SandBase Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandbase-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandbase-harness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-sandbase-harness