# llama.cpp vs samarium

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | samarium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #14 of 14 in ERP |
| GitHub stars | 132 663 ✓ | 507 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 306 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1458 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | b11969 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Blade |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 42/100 for samarium, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1458 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for samarium.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 306 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [samarium](https://selfhost.directory/project/samarium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/samarium.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-samarium