# llama.cpp vs rushdb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | rushdb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 132 714 ✓ | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 259 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 ✓ | 33 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for rushdb.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 259 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [rushdb](https://selfhost.directory/project/rushdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rushdb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-rushdb