llama.cppvsrudderstack
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | rudderstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 132 669 | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 312 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1460 | 39 |
| Latest release | b11971 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Go |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 63/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1460 stable releases in the past year, against 39 for rudderstack.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 312 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →rudderstack details →