# llama.cpp vs rtmp-hls-server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | rtmp-hls-server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #46 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 ✓ | 446 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1464 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 42/100 for rtmp-hls-server, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for rtmp-hls-server.

If you want the quickest setup, rtmp-hls-server is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [rtmp-hls-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/rtmp-hls-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rtmp-hls-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-rtmp-hls-server