# llama.cpp vs rsspush

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | rsspush |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #4 of 4 in RSS |
| GitHub stars | 132 669 ✓ | 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 312 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1460 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | b11971 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | C++ | — |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 42/100 for rsspush, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1460 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for rsspush.

If you want the quickest setup, rsspush is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 312 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [rsspush](https://selfhost.directory/project/rsspush) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rsspush.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-rsspush