llama.cppvsRSS Guard
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | RSS Guard | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #6 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 132 607 | 2 817 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 250 | +56 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1453 | 15 |
| Latest release | v0.8.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | 5.2.5 · 20 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 64/100 for RSS Guard, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1453 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for RSS Guard.
If you want the quickest setup, RSS Guard is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 250 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →RSS Guard details →