llama.cppvsRequest Tracker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | Request Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 132 722 | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 267 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1468 | 2 |
| Latest release | b11982 · 29 Oct 2026 | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1468 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 267 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →Request Tracker details →