llama.cppvsRemoteTerm for MeshCore
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | RemoteTerm for MeshCore | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #4 of 4 in Amateur Radio |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 | 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1464 | 10 |
| Latest release | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 | 3.17.1 · 26 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Python |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 45/100 for RemoteTerm for MeshCore, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for RemoteTerm for MeshCore.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; RemoteTerm for MeshCore needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →RemoteTerm for MeshCore details →