llama.cppvsrecyclarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | recyclarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #15 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 | 2 146 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1464 | 16 |
| Latest release | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 | v8.8.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | C# |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 64/100 for recyclarr, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for recyclarr.
If you want the quickest setup, recyclarr is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →recyclarr details →