# llama.cpp vs R2R

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | R2R |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 132 714 ✓ | 8 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 259 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 259 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [R2R](https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-r2r