# llama.cpp vs Proxmox Kubernetes Engine

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Proxmox Kubernetes Engine |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #10 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 ✓ | 244 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1464 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.0.7 · 13 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | — |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 41/100 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Proxmox Kubernetes Engine needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Proxmox Kubernetes Engine](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-kubernetes-engine.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-proxmox-kubernetes-engine