# llama.cpp vs proxmox-datacenter-manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | proxmox-datacenter-manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 132 663 ✓ | 146 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 306 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1460 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | b11971 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 48/100 for proxmox-datacenter-manager, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1460 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for proxmox-datacenter-manager.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; proxmox-datacenter-manager needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 306 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [proxmox-datacenter-manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-datacenter-manager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmox-datacenter-manager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-proxmox-datacenter-manager