llama.cppvsProject OSRM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | Project OSRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 132 607 | 8 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 250 | +75 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1451 | 16 |
| Latest release | b11954 · 28 Oct 2026 | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | C++ | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1451 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Project OSRM.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 250 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →Project OSRM details →