# llama.cpp vs pretalx

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | pretalx |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 3 in Conference Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 ✓ | 954 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2026.2.1 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 62/100 for pretalx, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for pretalx.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; pretalx needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [pretalx](https://selfhost.directory/project/pretalx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pretalx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-pretalx