# llama.cpp vs PowerSync Service

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | PowerSync Service |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #35 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 ✓ | 397 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1465 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | b11979 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.27.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 49/100 for PowerSync Service, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1465 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PowerSync Service.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; PowerSync Service needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [PowerSync Service](https://selfhost.directory/project/powersync-service) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/powersync-service.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-powersync-service