llama.cppvsPostHog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | PostHog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 132 669 | 40 497 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 312 | +588 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1461 | 3500 |
| Latest release | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 | agent-skills-v0.3890.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Python |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 81/100 for PostHog, so it is the safer default.
PostHog ships more often: 3500 stable releases in the past year, against 1461 for llama.cpp.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 312 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →PostHog details →