# llama.cpp vs Plausible Analytics

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Plausible Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 132 722 ✓ | 29 711 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 267 ✓ | +504 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 81/100 for Plausible Analytics, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Plausible Analytics.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 267 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Plausible Analytics](https://selfhost.directory/project/plausible-analytics) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/plausible-analytics.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-plausible-analytics