llama.cppvsPlausible Analytics
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | Plausible Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 | 29 708 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 | +501 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1466 | 3 |
| Latest release | b11980 · 29 Oct 2026 | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 81/100 for Plausible Analytics, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1466 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Plausible Analytics.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →Plausible Analytics details →