# llama.cpp vs Pictaria Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Pictaria Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #25 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 762 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 307 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1469 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | b11985 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.1 · 12 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 48/100 for Pictaria Server, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1469 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Pictaria Server.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 307 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Pictaria Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/pictaria-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pictaria-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-pictaria-server