# llama.cpp vs PhotoMigrator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | PhotoMigrator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #21 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 722 ✓ | 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 267 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 50/100 for PhotoMigrator, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for PhotoMigrator.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 267 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [PhotoMigrator](https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-photomigrator