# llama.cpp vs PDFMathTranslate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | PDFMathTranslate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 9 in Translation |
| GitHub stars | 132 646 ✓ | 37 998 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 289 ✓ | +286 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1458 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | b11969 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 80/100 for PDFMathTranslate, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1458 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for PDFMathTranslate.

If you want the quickest setup, PDFMathTranslate is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [PDFMathTranslate](https://selfhost.directory/project/pdfmathtranslate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pdfmathtranslate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-pdfmathtranslate