# llama.cpp vs Paseo

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Paseo |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #22 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 132 674 ✓ | 22 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 317 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1461 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 72/100 for Paseo, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Paseo.

If you want the quickest setup, Paseo is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 317 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Paseo](https://selfhost.directory/project/paseo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paseo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-paseo