# llama.cpp vs OxMgr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | OxMgr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #6 of 20 in Application Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 722 ✓ | 295 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 267 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1468 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | b11982 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 49/100 for OxMgr, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1468 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for OxMgr.

If you want the quickest setup, OxMgr is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 267 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [OxMgr](https://selfhost.directory/project/oxmgr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/oxmgr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-oxmgr